Curse

Phoenix Tears · Mar 21, 2008, 02:56 AM // 02:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by BahamutKaiser

I hate to be the cheap shrewd person who just claims this is already spent on another class, but.... Paragon.

Silly entertainment classes are not combat professions, they do not belong on the battlefield, Paragon is the only kind of "musician" that should be on the field, using songs of empowerment and lending a combatant hand.

Bards, Jesters, Mimes, and silly nonsense makes combat unreal, they are not real combat professions, and even if someone who was a jester was fighting, their combat talents are of a trade outside their entertainment features.

This can also be applied to loosely connected titles like Theif, Rogue, and Pirate, which are really professions and alignments, not a profession class. A warrior can Steal, a Ranger can live like a rogue, and a Monk can be a pirate. See Corsair for examples.

Paragon and Dervish do set standards of unrelated or mildly related identities to a combative class, so it isn't unacceptable, but a class name should still portray a combative feature.

This says the person, who wants such idiotic shit as "profession", like Dragons >.>, where Dragons are a RACE and no profession.

Do you remember ? Yeah, it was YOU, who made a long time ago this extreme childish CC about Dragons as new Class Rofl.

Any Profession, be it of agressive nature, or of normally friendly nature CAN Fight. This is just a fantasy game. With enough fantasy you can make nearly every possible profession to a strong fighter, which fulfills the point of being a medieval profession, ya even Merchants can fight...

Paragons are NO Bard, they are just idiotic 3 in 1 Wannabe-Shit. They don't look like Bards, they look like Clone Warriors (Soldiers) of the Rank of Commanders with the wrong weapon in their hands and total wrong skills...

Bards use Music Instruments, do you see any Paragon using instruments ? I don't, so they are only Wannabe Bards in heavy armors... uhm .. Bards wear no heavy armors >.> Bards would wear clothes to light armor, so they would be 60 or 70 Def, but not 96 Def !!!!! (80+16 from shield -.-) oh yeah, bards wear NO stupid shields !!!

The only thing what the paragon is, is the most biggest shit concept for a profession, the best example on how Developers of a game can massively FAIL on professions.

If paragons would be Bards, this would surely clear then, why Anet makes Concepts Arts for GW Utopia/ GW2, that show a REAL Bard...
I hope, we won't see in GW2 never again such Wannabe-Professions, like the Paragon... 3 in 1-professions are garbage

Must I show you all those concept art again, before certain people will understand here, what real bards are ?

THIS ARE BARDS!!:

http://www.angelfire.com/wa2/xia/images/GW2Cha006.jpg

At least do these Concept Arts from Anet show a Profession, that looks like Bards and that use as Weapon Music Instruments

Those ones here, those should be the ones, which should use the Song Skills of the paragon ... because to real bards they FIT. At the paragon, those Skills will ever look laughable and the profession will ever look like a childish fail...

PS: too dumb that your post is too old, disappeared somewhere into the archives or so, otherwise I would have quote linked your childish CC about Dragons as "profession", would have been again a good laugh

C R A F T · Mar 22, 2008, 09:34 AM // 09:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bard

hmm, my own class /ponder
sure why not ^__^

*snicker* lol rofl *cough* *choke*

Sorry, but that was beautiful!

[M]agna_[C]arta · Mar 22, 2008, 10:35 AM // 10:35

.................................................. .................................................. ....

The Hell are you guys doing, Having a Conversation with people from Last Year February?
You do know it's Very old, and they wouldn't feedback to you anyways.
Kinda odd when peole comment on Old CCs which drowned to the drains.